The failure to name, defame, indict, or arrest the clients of Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, and Sean "Diddy" Combs, despite their own high-profile arrests, points to a troubling pattern of selective accountability that protects the powerful. This seems to run across party lines, not specific to Democrat or Republican. These individuals operated within elite circles, allegedly facilitating or engaging in egregious acts of exploitation and trafficking, yet the focus remains narrowly on them as individuals rather than the broader networks they served. The clients—often wealthy, influential figures in politics, business, or entertainment—appear shielded by a system that prioritizes discretion over justice. This suggests a deliberate effort to limit exposure, perhaps to avoid destabilizing institutions or reputations tied to these networks. The lack of transparency fuels suspicion that those in power are complicit in preserving a status quo where the elite evade scrutiny, leaving only the orchestrators to face consequences while their patrons remain untouched.

This disparity in accountability undermines public trust in the justice system and perpetuates a culture of impunity for the privileged. If Epstein, Maxwell, and Combs were indeed central to criminal enterprises, their clients were not mere bystanders but active participants who enabled and benefited from these schemes. The absence of indictments or even public naming of these individuals raises questions about whether investigations are intentionally curtailed to protect those with the means to influence outcomes. Systemic barriers, such as sealed records, private settlements, or prosecutorial reluctance to challenge powerful figures, may be at play, ensuring that the client lists remain shrouded in secrecy. By failing to pursue these clients, authorities risk signaling that justice is a privilege reserved for the few, leaving victims without full reckoning and society grappling with the unsettling reality that some are above the law.

A thread on Epstein, Maxwell, Diddy and their criminal elite sex trafficking networks👇 Here’s a prev thread

https://twitter.com/deepbluecrypto/status/1910141316853379509

Thank God Dr. Fauci isn’t incharge of NIH anymore.

Thank God we can protect the world against their lies and betrayals.

A thread on Dr. Evil Fauci👇

https://twitter.com/deepbluecrypto/status/1892740955670712377

Here’s a prev thread on Dr. Evil Fauci

https://twitter.com/deepbluecrypto/status/1853605107817984027

EACH AND EVERY TIME GOVERNMENT TRIES TO SOLVE A PROBLEM, THEY END UP CREATING MORE

Chaos: Governments, in their attempt to impose order, often create chaos by disrupting established systems. For example, a sudden policy to nationalize industries can lead to mismanagement, supply chain breakdowns, and public unrest as businesses struggle to adapt.

Assault: Governments may use force to enforce laws, sometimes escalating to violence against citizens. For instance, during protests, police deployed by the state might use tear gas or batons, injuring peaceful demonstrators.

Theft: Through taxation or seizure, governments can take property without consent, resembling theft. An example is eminent domain, where a person's home is taken for public projects, often with inadequate compensation.

Extortion: Governments can pressure individuals or businesses for money or compliance under threat of punishment. For example, a small business might face hefty fines or closure unless it pays inflated licensing fees demanded by local officials.

Intimidation: State authorities may intimidate citizens to suppress dissent or enforce compliance. A citizen criticizing government policy online might receive threatening visits from law enforcement, discouraging free speech.

Collusion: Governments can collude with private entities to prioritize elite interests over the public. For instance, a government might award contracts to a favored corporation in exchange for political donations, sidelining fair competition.

Discrimination: Policies may unfairly target or exclude certain groups, fostering inequality. An example is a law banning specific religious practices, disproportionately harming minority communities while favoring others.

Trauma: Government actions, like forced displacements or aggressive policing, can inflict emotional and physical trauma. For example, children separated from parents during immigration enforcement may suffer long-term psychological harm.

Tyranny: Overreaching authority can lead to oppressive rule, stifling freedoms. A government imposing strict curfews and censoring media to control a crisis can erode personal liberties, resembling tyrannical rule.

Death: In extreme cases, government actions result in loss of life. For instance, a poorly planned military operation to address insurgency might lead to civilian casualties due to collateral damage. Here’s a prev thread

https://twitter.com/DeepBlueCrypto/status/1906049279011279163

The Federal Reserve was born in sin — all those that had power to oppose the creation of the FED died on Titanic.

In 1910 The Rockefellers, Rothschild, JP Morgan and other Private Bankers gathered on Jekyll Island to create “The Federal Reserve”

Here’s a prev thread on the FED

https://twitter.com/deepbluecrypto/status/1893766849684193488

Infographics are essential to convey information to people in the modern world.

A thread 🧵 #33 for your awareness👇 Here’s a prev thread

https://twitter.com/deepbluecrypto/status/1907444086660903023

In just three months as the 47th President, Donald Trump has governed with a ferocity that seems fueled by the trials of his past—indictments, investigations, assassination attempts, and impeachments—emerging not as a man diminished, but as one emboldened to deliver on his promises with unrelenting focus. His campaign pledges, once dismissed by critics as bombastic rhetoric, are materializing at a breakneck pace, reflecting a leader who thrives under pressure and channels adversity into action. From sweeping border security measures to economic policies aimed at revitalizing American industry, Trump’s early tenure feels like a defiant rebuttal to those who doubted his resolve, proving that the chaos of his journey has only sharpened his determination to reshape the nation in his image.

What’s most striking is how Trump has turned promises into tangible outcomes, defying the inertia that often bogs down presidencies. He’s tackled illegal immigration with a vigor that’s already shifting the landscape, while imposing tariffs to bolster domestic production, moves that echo his “America First” mantra and resonate with a base hungry for results. Gas, grocery and egg prices have eased, a practical win for everyday Americans, while his administration’s bold strokes—like dismantling bureaucratic excess and confronting global adversaries—signal a rejection of the status quo. For a man who’s faced relentless scrutiny, Trump’s first 90 days suggest not just survival, but a triumphant assertion of his vision, delivering a governance style as unapologetic and unconventional as the path that brought him back to power.

A thread on politics and politicians👇 Here’s a prev thread

https://twitter.com/deepbluecrypto/status/1902319347407712416

“EPSTEIN CLIENTS ARE ABOVE THE LAW”

The statement that "more squirrels and raccoons have been arrested than Epstein clients" highlights a stark disparity between the enforcement of minor, even absurd, regulations and the apparent reluctance to pursue justice against powerful individuals implicated in Jeffrey Epstein’s criminal network. In late 2024, the case of Peanut the Squirrel and Fred the Raccoon captured public attention when New York’s Department of Environmental Conservation raided Mark Longo’s home, seizing and euthanizing these animals over claims of illegal possession and rabies risks. The operation involved multiple agents and hours of effort, showcasing a swift and decisive response to what many saw as a trivial violation. This incident, amplified by social media outrage, underscores how authorities can mobilize resources to "arrest" or address wildlife-related issues, even when the targets are harmless pets, while seemingly ignoring far graver human crimes.

In contrast, the Epstein case—despite overwhelming evidence of a sex trafficking operation involving influential figures—has seen remarkably little accountability for his clients. Epstein, a financier with ties to politicians, billionaires, and royalty, was arrested in 2019 and died in custody, officially ruled a suicide, though conspiracy theories abound. Court documents unsealed in recent years name numerous associates, yet few, if any, of these high-profile individuals have faced arrest or prosecution. The disparity fuels public frustration: while a squirrel’s fate can prompt a government raid, the powerful men who allegedly exploited minors alongside Epstein remain largely untouchable, shielded by wealth, status, or legal loopholes. This juxtaposition paints a compelling picture of a system that prioritizes the enforcement of petty rules over the pursuit of justice for heinous crimes, leaving society to question where true accountability lies.

A thread on Epstein and his clients👇 Here’s a prev thread

https://twitter.com/DeepBlueCrypto/status/1895611012335763888

Infographics are essential to convey information to people in the modern world.

A thread 🧵 #31 for your awareness👇 Here’s a prev thread

https://twitter.com/deepbluecrypto/status/1893768537480511621

The influence of corporate money in politics is a pervasive force that often shapes government inaction on issues like genetically modified organisms (GMOs). Companies like Bayer and Monsanto, with their deep pockets and extensive lobbying networks, have the resources to sway policymakers in their favor. They contribute millions to political campaigns, ensuring that elected officials remain sympathetic to their interests. This financial leverage creates a system where legislation or regulation that might harm these corporations’ bottom lines—such as banning or heavily restricting GMOs—is quietly sidelined. The revolving door between government agencies and corporate boardrooms only deepens this entanglement, as former industry executives often take regulatory roles, bringing their biases with them.

Beyond direct political influence, these corporations have mastered the art of shaping public perception through partnerships with universities and media outlets. By funding research at academic institutions, they can produce studies that downplay or dismiss health concerns related to GMOs, lending a veneer of scientific legitimacy to their products. These studies are then amplified by media campaigns, often subtly sponsored or influenced by the same corporations, to reassure the public that GMOs are safe and necessary for feeding a growing population. Dissenting voices—independent researchers or whistleblowers raising red flags about potential health risks—are drowned out or discredited, leaving regulators with a convenient excuse: the “science” isn’t conclusive enough to justify action.

Finally, the government’s inertia can be attributed to a broader economic calculus that prioritizes short-term gains over long-term public health. GMOs are deeply embedded in the agricultural industry, which contributes significantly to GDP and employs millions. Disrupting this system by cracking down on GMO foods would ripple through the economy, threatening jobs, trade relationships, and corporate profits—consequences no administration wants to face. Politicians, wary of being labeled as anti-business or anti-progress, opt for the path of least resistance, allowing these food giants to operate with minimal oversight. Meanwhile, any evidence of harm to human health is buried under bureaucratic delays or dismissed as anecdotal, preserving the status quo where profit trumps precaution.

A thread on health and wellness👇 Here’s a prev thread

https://twitter.com/deepbluecrypto/status/1885380639232307507

Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s leadership at the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) promises a transformative shift by prioritizing transparency and rebuilding public trust in a system that many Americans have grown skeptical of, particularly since the COVID-19 pandemic. His commitment to "radical transparency" addresses a core issue: the erosion of confidence in federal health agencies due to perceived corporate influence and opaque decision-making. By vowing to dismantle conflicts of interest—such as the revolving door between regulatory bodies and the pharmaceutical industry—Kennedy aims to ensure that health policies serve the public, not profit-driven corporations. This approach could restore faith in institutions like the CDC and FDA, making them more accountable and responsive to citizens’ needs rather than entrenched interests.

Beyond transparency, Kennedy’s focus on tackling the chronic disease epidemic offers a bold departure from the status quo. He has signaled an intent to investigate previously "taboo" or under-scrutinized contributors to poor health—ultra-processed foods, environmental toxins like glyphosates, and overreliance on pharmaceuticals—through rigorous, unbiased science. This proactive stance contrasts with the reactive, symptom-management model that dominates current healthcare. By shifting HHS’s emphasis toward prevention and root causes, Kennedy could reduce the staggering burden of conditions like obesity, diabetes, and autoimmune disorders, particularly among children, potentially saving billions in healthcare costs and improving quality of life for millions.

Finally, Kennedy’s outsider perspective and willingness to challenge entrenched norms could revitalize an agency often criticized for bureaucratic inertia. His history as an environmental lawyer and advocate demonstrates a tenacity for taking on powerful entities, suggesting he won’t shy away from overhauling outdated systems or questioning long-held assumptions, such as the childhood vaccine schedule’s scope. While his skepticism of certain medical orthodoxies has sparked controversy, his pledge to let science guide policy—coupled with a commission to address chronic disease—offers a chance to modernize HHS. If he succeeds in aligning the agency’s vast resources with a mission to "Make America Healthy Again," Kennedy could turn HHS into a dynamic force for genuine health reform, rather than a caretaker of a broken status quo.

A thread on big Pharma, vaccines and health👇 Here’s a prev thread

https://twitter.com/DeepBlueCrypto/status/1890076399274447254

"We are a stronger and safer Europe with President Trump back in the White House". Italian PM Giorgia Meloni gives her full support to @realDonaldTrump and VP @JDVance in a stirring speech at QPAC today.

The Italian leader also spoke of national sovereignty over leftist totalitarianism and common sense over woke insanity.

A thread on Italy 🇮🇹 Here’s a prev thread on Italy 🇮🇹

Infographics are essential to convey information to people in the modern world.

“ALL ROADS LEAD TO ROME”

A thread 🧵 #30 for your awareness👇 Here’s a prev thread

https://twitter.com/deepbluecrypto/status/1889098835483341117

The Federal Reserve’s role as a private institution masquerading as a federal entity has long been a thorn in the side of economic stability. Its ability to print money at will and loan it to the government with interest creates a vicious cycle of debt and inflation that erodes the dollar’s purchasing power. Since abandoning the gold standard in 1971, the Fed has had free rein to expand the money supply unchecked, leading to a staggering loss in the dollar’s value—over 85% in the last five decades alone. This isn’t just mismanagement; it’s a structural flaw. The Fed’s dual mandate of controlling inflation and unemployment often clashes, and its reliance on manipulating interest rates and flooding the system with fiat currency prioritizes short-term bandaids over long-term health, leaving everyday Americans to bear the cost as prices soar and savings dwindle.

The consequences are glaringly obvious in the real world. When the Fed pumps trillions into the economy—like the $4 trillion unleashed during the COVID-19 crisis—it dilutes the dollar’s worth, driving up the cost of essentials like food, housing, and energy. This isn’t a glitch; it’s a feature of a system that thrives on perpetual debt. The interest charged on money it creates out of thin air ensures the government—and by extension, taxpayers—are locked into an ever-growing burden, while the Fed’s unelected board answers to no one but its banking overlords. Meanwhile, wages stagnate, and the average person’s purchasing power crumbles, widening the wealth gap as the elite profit from the inflationary churn. History backs this up: the dollar’s sharpest declines align with the Fed’s loosest policies, proving it’s less a guardian of stability and more a catalyst for erosion.

Reversing this mess demands bold, radical shifts. First, reinstate a tangible anchor like the gold standard—or even a basket of commodities—to tie the dollar’s value to something real, curbing the Fed’s ability to print endlessly. Second, dismantle its monopoly by allowing competing currencies, whether state-backed or private, to challenge the dollar and force accountability through market discipline; if people can opt out, the Fed would have to rethink its reckless habits. Finally, audit and overhaul the Fed itself, stripping its secrecy and subjecting it to democratic oversight—let the public see where the money flows and who’s really pulling the strings. These steps won’t erase decades of damage overnight, but they’d break the cycle of devaluation, restore trust in the currency, and give power back to the people instead of a shadowy cartel. The dollar’s worth shouldn’t be a plaything for bankers—it’s time to take it back.

A 🧵 on Federal Reserve and central banks👇 Here’s a prev thread

https://twitter.com/DeepBlueCrypto/status/1884637131496095861

In a society where ninety-nine are weak,
Catering to one percent, the woke mind virus we seek.
We bend, we twist, in endless contortions,
For those whose views demand our constant attention.

Enough is enough, we must stand and say,
No more to the norms that lead us astray.
We're lost in a maze of virtue so fake,
Where common sense and reason are hard to make.

Break the shackles of this modern-day plight,
Where speaking freely invites social fight.
We've tiptoed around, afraid to offend,
But now is the time to make our voices blend.

Let's reclaim the ground where logic once stood,
Where truth wasn't buried under virtue's wood.
We'll rise from the shadows, no longer confined,
To a world where the sane are not redefined.

Enough with the madness, the guilt, and the shame,
We'll break these chains in freedom's name.
For unity, not division, we'll strive,
In a society where all can truly thrive. Here’s a prev thread on #WokeMindVirus

https://twitter.com/DeepBlueCrypto/status/1886739648417825020

@DavidSacks blasts USAID for using American taxpayers to fund left-wing organizations and policies around the world.

"We're in debt almost $40 trillion, and the money is all laundered to them and their left crony entities and media orgs”

A 🧵 on DOGE👇

Here’s a prev thread

https://twitter.com/deepbluecrypto/status/1887599591404806332

The acronym "DOGE" "Democrats Officially Getting Exposed." It is used to imply that the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), led by Elon Musk under the administration of President Donald Trump, is revealing or exposing alleged inefficiencies, fraud, and corruption supposedly linked to Democratic policies or government operations they've been in charge of or supported.

🚩Fraudulent Activities Uncovered by DOGE:

1. Improper Payments at the Treasury Department:
- DOGE has claimed that payment approval officers at the Treasury Department were instructed to approve payments indiscriminately, even to known fraudulent or terrorist groups.

2. USAID Operations:
- DOGE has been involved in the shutdown of the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), asserting that it is rife with fraud and waste. Specific claims include the agency funding projects like a DEI musical in Ireland and transgender opera in Colombia.

3. Access to Sensitive Government Systems:
- There are reports of DOGE gaining access to sensitive data, including Treasury payment systems, which could involve personal financial information of citizens.

4. Alleged Waste in Federal Spending:
- DOGE has announced savings, such as canceling over $1 billion in federal diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) contracts, suggesting these were wasteful or fraudulent expenditures.

5. General Claims of Fraud and Abuse:
- Broad assertions have been made by DOGE about uncovering "massive fraud, abuse, money laundering, and corruption" within government operations, though specifics beyond the above examples are less detailed in public reports.

A thread on @DOGE 👇 Here’s a prev thread

https://twitter.com/deepbluecrypto/status/1886537361997148441

Infographics are essential to convey information to people in the modern world.

A thread 🧵 #28 for your awareness👇 Here’s a prev thread

https://twitter.com/deepbluecrypto/status/1880728428665831763

The global financial system is extraordinarily sensitive to the pronouncements of the Federal Reserve's chief due to the pivotal role the U.S. dollar plays in international trade and finance. As the world's reserve currency, fluctuations in U.S. monetary policy directly influence global liquidity, interest rates, and economic stability. When the Fed chair speaks, whether it's about interest rate decisions, inflation targets, or economic outlooks, markets around the globe adjust in anticipation or reaction. Investors, from Wall Street to the smallest foreign exchange traders, scrutinize every word for hints of policy shifts that could affect asset valuations, currency strength, and investment strategies. This reliance stems from the understanding that changes in U.S. policy can ripple through economies worldwide, affecting everything from commodity prices to international borrowing costs.

This dependency is further amplified by the psychological impact of the Fed's statements. The markets operate on a blend of hard data and human emotion, where confidence or uncertainty can sway economic directions significantly. The Federal Reserve's chief, therefore, not only sets the tone for economic policy but also manages market psychology. A mere suggestion of tightening or easing monetary policy can lead to immediate market movements, as traders and investors adjust their portfolios to hedge against perceived risks or capitalize on new opportunities. This dynamic creates a self-fulfilling prophecy where the Fed's words can shape economic reality by influencing investor behavior, credit availability, and consumer confidence, often before any actual policy changes are enacted.

Moreover, the absence of a truly global monetary authority makes the Federal Reserve's chair one of the most influential figures in international finance. Other central banks and governments watch closely, often aligning their policies to mitigate or leverage the effects of U.S. monetary decisions. This isn't merely about following the dollar; it's about navigating the complex web of global economic interdependence where the U.S. economy, due to its size and influence, acts as a linchpin. The Fed's communication strategy, thus, becomes a critical tool not just for domestic policy but for global financial stability. This concentration of influence underscores a system where one person's words can dictate the financial health and economic direction of nations far beyond U.S. borders, highlighting our world's reliance on the Federal Reserve chief's rhetoric.

A thread on federal reserve and central banks Here’s a prev thread on the same

https://twitter.com/deepbluecrypto/status/1868353769093660924

Argentina's Javier Milei says LGBT "gender ideology constitutes plain and simple child abuse. They are pedophiles."

Don’t fall for their traps in schools, colleges and other public forums. Why would they target children… because they’re the most vulnerable and easy targets. Here’s a previous thread on the same

https://twitter.com/DeepBlueCrypto/status/1875664045463777764

This isn’t a conspiracy theory… but the truth

Here's why systems dominated by certain sectors might inherently fail to achieve broader societal goals:

🚩A Country Run by Banks Will Always Be in Debt:

- **Profit Over Stability:** Banks inherently aim to maximize profit, which often involves lending money and charging interest. This creates a cycle of perpetual debt for the state, as governments need to borrow to fund operations, infrastructure, and crises. The more debt there is, the more interest accumulates, ensuring that the debt never truly diminishes.

- **Economic Dependency:** By controlling financial policies, banks can dictate economic conditions that favor debt accumulation, like low interest rates that encourage borrowing or high inflation rates that devalue currency, increasing the nominal value of debt.

🚩Healthcare Run by Big Pharma Will Never Cure Disease:

- **Financial Incentives:** Curing diseases is less profitable than managing chronic conditions. Big Pharma benefits from long-term treatments where patients need continuous medication, rather than one-time cures which would eliminate future revenue from that ailment.

- **Research Focus:** The pharmaceutical industry's R&D is heavily influenced by potential market size and profitability rather than public health needs, often sidelining research into cures for less common or less profitable diseases.

- **Regulatory Influence:** Through lobbying, big pharma can influence regulations and drug approval processes to favor treatments that don't eradicate diseases but manage symptoms, thus ensuring sustained sales.

🚩A State Run by War Will Never Know Peace:

- **Perpetual Conflict:** Military-industrial complexes thrive on conflict. Wars justify defense budgets, contracts, and arms sales. Peace reduces these opportunities, hence there's an institutional bias towards maintaining some level of tension or conflict.

- **Political Power:** Military leaders or regimes often gain and retain power through war, making peace less appealing as it might lead to a reduction in their control or influence.

- **Economic Dependency:** Economies can become dependent on war industries for jobs and innovation, creating a cycle where peace is economically destabilizing.

🚩A Nation Run by Media Will Never Know the Truth:

- **Profit from Sensationalism:** Media outlets often prioritize sensational, controversial, or divisive content to attract viewership, which can distort facts or omit context for the sake of engagement.

- **Control Over Information:** Media conglomerates can influence public opinion by controlling what information is disseminated, how it's framed, or even by suppressing stories that don't align with their interests or those of their sponsors.

- **Bias and Agenda Setting:** Whether through political alignment, ownership biases, or advertiser influence, media can skew narratives away from objective truth towards narratives that benefit their agendas or maintain viewer loyalty.

In each case, the systemic incentives and structures prioritize outcomes that align with the dominant institution's interests rather than the public good or societal well-being. Here’s a previous thread on conspiracy theories

https://twitter.com/DeepBlueCrypto/status/1874447607583445081

The issue of Muslim grooming gangs in Britain involves groups of men, primarily of Pakistani heritage, who were involved in the systematic sexual exploitation of young, mostly white, girls. These crimes took place over several decades, particularly highlighted in towns like Rotherham, Rochdale, and Telford.

**Nature of the Crimes:**
These gangs would typically target vulnerable young girls, often from disadvantaged backgrounds, using methods such as providing gifts, alcohol, or drugs to manipulate and control them. The abuse included rape, trafficking, and other forms of sexual exploitation, often occurring in a group setting where girls were passed among multiple men for abuse.

**Scale of Impact:**
While exact numbers are difficult to ascertain due to the scale and historical nature of these crimes, various reports suggest:

- In Rotherham alone, an independent inquiry estimated around 1,400 children were sexually exploited between 1997 and 2013. However, some sources suggest that the total number of victims across the UK could reach into the tens of thousands over the span of decades.
- In Telford, one investigation suggested that over 1,000 girls could have been affected over several decades.

**Cover-up Allegations:**
The allegations of cover-ups primarily involve:

- **Police**: Concerns have been raised that the police were reluctant to act due to fears of being perceived as racist or stirring up racial tensions. This hesitation led to insufficient action, with some victims' complaints being dismissed or not taken seriously. There were instances where police officers reportedly did not pursue leads or investigations because they were concerned about community relations or accusations of racial profiling.

- **Labour Party Politicians**: Critics argue that Labour politicians, particularly in areas with significant minority populations, were aware of these crimes but prioritized community cohesion and electoral considerations over addressing the abuse. There have been accusations that local councils, often led by Labour, downplayed or ignored the ethnic dimension of these crimes to avoid accusations of racism, thereby failing the victims.

- **Silence and Inaction**: The term "political correctness" has often been cited as a reason for the silence, where fear of backlash for highlighting the ethnicity of the perpetrators led to systemic failures. This included not only inaction but also in some cases, active suppression of information or downplaying the severity of the incidents.

**Public and Political Response:**
The issue has become politically charged, with debates over the extent to which ethnicity played a role in both the crimes and the cover-up. There has been criticism from various political quarters about the handling of these cases, with calls for more accountability, better policing strategies, and cultural changes within communities to address such issues.

The response from both police and political figures has evolved over time, with more recent commitments to tackle these issues head-on, including the establishment of task forces to investigate grooming gangs. However, the historical mishandling remains a point of contention and has been used in political discourse to critique the approach of past administrations and local governance. Here’s a previous thread on the same

https://twitter.com/DeepBlueCrypto/status/1874840904168833173